One might assume that, given Jesus Himself handpicked the apostles, their mindsets and personalities would naturally align or complement each other. However, the reality was quite different. Despite their close relationship with Jesus, the apostles often found themselves in disagreement when struggling to fully understand or accept His radical teachings.
Their disagreements weren’t trivial; they were profound discussions about faith, meaning, and practice. These conversations, at times intense and contentious, would play a pivotal role in shaping Christianity’s development. Here are 12 instances of disagreement among the apostles, shedding light on the evolving and dynamic nature of early Christian thought and the very human journey of shaping a revolutionary religious movement.
Circumcision Controversy
The issue of circumcision became a pivotal theological and cultural debate in the early Christian church. This disagreement, as recounted in Acts 15, was about whether Gentile converts needed to be circumcised and fully adhere to Jewish law to be accepted as Christians. Peter, James, and other Jewish Christians initially believed that salvation required complete compliance with Mosaic traditions, viewing circumcision as an essential covenant marker inherited from Abraham.
On the other hand, Paul boldly advocated for a more inclusive approach. He argued that faith in Jesus Christ was the sole requirement for salvation. During the Council of Jerusalem, he challenged the traditional view, asserting that circumcision was not necessary for Gentile believers. His argument ultimately prevailed, marking a transformative moment that would allow Christianity to spread beyond its Jewish roots and become a truly universal faith.
Paul and Barnabas’ Split
The disagreement between Paul and Barnabas marked a significant personal and ministerial conflict during their missionary journeys. The issue arose over John Mark, who had abandoned them on a previous mission. Barnabas, staying true to his role as an encourager, wanted to give John Mark a second chance, believing he could grow and redeem himself. Paul, however, viewed John Mark’s previous desertion as a risk that could compromise the effectiveness of their missionary work.
The disagreement grew so intense that Paul and Barnabas decided to part ways. While the separation was undoubtedly difficult, it ultimately led to a broader spread of the gospel as both pursued their missions along different paths with new partners. Their split highlights the complexities of relationships within the ministry and the different approaches to restoration and trust.
Peter’s Hypocrisy
Peter’s inconsistent actions toward Gentile Christians revealed the underlying cultural tensions within the early church. At first, he openly associated with and shared meals with Gentile believers, embracing the inclusive nature of Christ’s message. Yet, when certain Jewish Christians arrived from Jerusalem, Peter distanced himself from the Gentiles, reverting to traditional Jewish customs and social norms.
Paul called him out over this inconsistency, pointing out that his actions contradicted the core Christian values of equality and unity in Christ. Withdrawing from Gentile fellowship reinforced divisions. This incident revealed the ongoing challenge of overcoming cultural and religious barriers in the early Christian movement.
Leadership and Authority Disputes
Leadership conflicts among the apostles exposed the human dynamics within the early Christian movement. The disciples often vied for positions of prominence, each convinced of their unique perspective or a closer connection to Jesus. This competitive spirit was particularly evident in Luke 9:46, where the disciples argued about who would be the greatest. Jesus, aware of their thoughts, responded by placing a child beside Him and teaching that true greatness comes from humility and a willingness to serve others.
This moment highlighted not only the apostles’ human struggles with ambition but also Jesus’ radical redefinition of leadership, which is rooted in servanthood rather than status. Such lessons gradually shaped the apostles’ understanding of their roles, guiding the early church toward a leadership model that prioritized humility and selflessness.
The Debate on Who Could Sit at Jesus’ Right Hand
The disciples’ argument about who would sit at Jesus’ right hand exposed their ongoing struggle with worldly concepts of power and status. In Mark 10:35-45, James and John, along with their mother, approached Jesus to request seats of honor at His right and left in His kingdom. Their bold request highlighted a misunderstanding of Jesus’ mission and His teachings on servant leadership.
Jesus used this moment as a profound teaching opportunity, explaining that true leadership in his kingdom was about service, not status. He challenged their worldly understanding of power, emphasizing that the greatest among them would be those who learned to serve others selflessly. This interaction demonstrated the apostles’ initial difficulty in accepting the radical nature of Jesus’ spiritual teachings and the self-sacrificial path He called them to follow.
Baptism Practices
The apostles had differing views on how to baptize new believers properly. In Acts 19:1-7, Paul meets a group of people who had only been baptized by John. When he explains to them the necessity of being baptized in the name of Jesus Christ, they are baptized again. This moment reveals how the church’s understanding of baptism developed over time. While Peter and some others saw baptism primarily as a symbol of repentance and salvation, Paul emphasized the importance of being baptized into Jesus’ name to fully receive the Holy Spirit. This difference in approach led to significant discussions regarding the meaning and purpose of baptism in early Christian practice.
Disagreement About Food Sacrificed to Idols
The disagreement about food sacrificed to idols revealed early Christian communities’ cultural and spiritual challenges. Some apostles, particularly those with stronger Jewish backgrounds, believed that consuming meat previously offered to pagan deities constituted spiritual compromise and potential idolatry. They viewed such consumption as a form of participation in pagan worship, which could potentially contaminate the believers’ spiritual purity.
Paul offered a more nuanced perspective, arguing that idols were essentially meaningless and that sacrificing food did not change its spiritual status. He maintained that Christians possessed the spiritual freedom to eat such food, provided it did not offend weaker believers or lead them into spiritual confusion. This debate reflected broader tensions between cultural traditions and emerging Christian theological principles.
Interpretation of Jesus’ Resurrection
The apostles showed significant differences in understanding and interpreting Jesus’ resurrection. In John 20:24-25, Thomas demanded physical proof of Jesus’ return, expressing his initial skepticism and need for tangible evidence. His hesitation to believe the resurrection without personal verification revealed the spiritual challenges that arose from encountering such a miraculous and unprecedented event.
Other apostles, like Peter and John, seemed to accept the resurrection more readily, though their understanding evolved over time. Their varying reactions showed the complex and evolving nature of early Christian theology. As they worked through their doubts and experiences, these differences ultimately led to a richer and more nuanced understanding of the resurrection. This understanding ultimately shaped the foundation of Christian belief in life after death and the victory over sin.
Teaching on Divorce
In Matthew 19:3-12, the Pharisees approached Jesus, asking Him about the legality of divorce. The apostles engaged in the discussion later on, revealing their concerns about Jesus’ teachings on marriage and relationship dissolution.
Although this passage does not describe a direct disagreement among the apostles, it does highlight their struggle to understand Jesus’ high standards of marriage and how difficult it can be to live according to God’s ideal.
The Greatest in the Kingdom
The apostles frequently discussed spiritual hierarchy and status within Jesus’ anticipated kingdom. Matthew 18:1-4 describes how they asked Jesus who would be the greatest in the kingdom of heaven. Jesus responded by calling a child to Himself and teaching them that greatness in God’s kingdom is measured by humility, not by position or power.
This moment revealed their struggle to detach from worldly views of status and authority. Their focus on titles and hierarchy highlighted a deep-rooted desire for recognition, common among those raised in a society that valued power and prominence. Jesus consistently challenged these perspectives, pointing to humility, service, and the pure faith of a child as the true hallmarks of greatness in His kingdom.
Marriage and Celibacy
The apostles demonstrated varying perspectives on marriage and sexual relationships within the Christian community. Paul famously advocated for celibacy as an ideal spiritual state, believing that unmarried individuals could devote themselves more completely to their spiritual journey without being distracted by familial responsibilities.
Other apostles, including Peter, who was married, saw family life as entirely compatible with Christian discipleship. They believed that marriage could be a profound expression of divine love and partnership. These differing perspectives reflected the complex balance between spirituality, human relationships, and personal calling.
Disagreement Over the Mission to the Samaritans
In Luke 9:51-56, James and John, known as the “Sons of Thunder,” wanted to call down fire from heaven to destroy a Samaritan village that rejected Jesus. Jesus rebuked them, teaching them that His mission was not to destroy but to save. This incident shows the apostles’ misunderstanding of the scope of Jesus’ mission, highlighting their resistance to engaging with groups outside of traditional Jewish circles.
Unity in Diversity
The apostles’ disagreements highlight the challenges that come with following Jesus and sharing His message. Yet, each dispute contributed to greater understanding, unity, and development in the early church. These struggles helped shape the core of Christian doctrine and practice, showing that even amid conflict, God can use His followers to accomplish His will.
More From Hope No Matter What
10 Common Myths About King David That Aren’t True
13 Lies Christians Believe About Their Faith that Lead to Discouragement
15 Common Reasons People Reject Jesus
15 Misconceptions About Jesus Christ That the Bible Addresses
Vidivir is a dedicated high school teacher and a loving mother of three. With over a decade of experience as a blogger and article writer, she has honed her craft in storytelling. As a devoted church lector and servant of God, she combines her passion for writing with her faith, aiming to inspire others through her words.